Archive for the ‘Geography’ Category

ICECAPS Science Phase Begins!

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

We have had some really nice weather here at Summit this past week; mild temperatures, light winds, and clear sky.  Most of our instrumentation is in place and the instrument mentors are beginning to calibrate, make final adjustments, and collect preliminary data.  Since we are interested in cloud measurements, we are excited that a very timely low pressure system is moving in within the next couple days.  It will provide us with plenty of opportunity to make some initial cloud measurements while the majority of the ICECAPS crew is still on site.  This is important to Brad and I who are the two crew members planning to spend time as science techs for the project.  The instruments are largely autonomous, but we need to train on how to run them, interpret raw data output, monitor for problems, and troubleshoot common problems.
Our radiosounding (weather balloon) program is now up and running.  We launch twice daily in accordance with the international radiosonde network time standard of 0000 and 1200 UTC (9:30 AM and PM local time).  The radiosonde systems are helium filled balloons with humidity/temperature sensors and parachutes attached.  Each flight lasts about 90 minutes and reaches a height around 25-27 km above sea level.  During the flight the sensor continuously relays temperature and humidity readings to a ground station, providing the ICECAPS project with in situ vertical column measurements of these variables.  We are able to get a complete profile of the troposphere and much of the stratosphere.  We have been taking turns launching the radiosondes.  It was my turn to do this morning’s launch.  The picture below shows me in action.
It is very exciting for us that we are now at the dawn of the science phase of ICECAPS!

blog_sonde

Me launching one of the first ICECAPS radiosondes.

More from Summit Camp

Sunday, May 23rd, 2010

I’ve been at Summit for over a week now.  I’m getting used to camp life and finding that I am enjoying it here very much.  There is a really great group of people up here.  The station staff in particular have been enormously friendly and helpful.  The heavy equipment operators and carpenters have done an amazing job getting the ICECAPS building (called the Mobile Science Facility or “MSF”) prepared and helping us move in.
What’s the coolest thing about MSF?  MSF is on skis!  It will be moved from time to time (maybe twice per year, we don’t know yet) between two “permanent” locations so that it can maintain a level orientation and be kept free of the drifts which would otherwise bury the building in snow.  The other day MSF was moved to one of these locations by being towed behind a bulldozer (see photo below).
Now that MSF is finished and in place, we are in the process of assembling the instruments which include three lidars, a radar, and several sophisticated infrared sensors.  Using this suite of instrumentation we will be able to build a picture of the atmospheric state over a very important, yet poorly understood region of the planet, the Greenland Ice Sheet.  We are interested in answering questions related to the surface energy budget, the processes involved in the development of clouds, surface-atmosphere-cloud interactions, and precipitation.  This research is very important to understanding and modeling the surface energy budget and mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet, processes that are closely coupled to the global climate.  In the next few days we should be receiving the first data streams.  At that time we will begin to launch radiosondes twice every day.
Having an interest in the atmosphere and being in the Arctic offers some rare treats.  In addition to the aurora borealis which is observed during the long polar night, the Arctic summer offers some pretty neat optical phenomena.  Today, while walking between buildings we noticed a particular type of halo called a parahelic circle.
A parahelic circle is a colorless halo that is parallel to the ground.  It passes through sundogs (bright spots to the side of the sun), the sun, and runs a full 360 degrees around you.  I couldn’t take a picture of the whole circle, but a portion of it is shown in a photo below along with another halo that appeared the other day.  The halos are formed by the refraction and reflection of light through small ice crystals in the air.
That’s all from Summit for now.  Thanks for reading!

blog_msf

They don't call it the Mobile Science Facility for nothing!

blog_parahelic

A segment of a parahelic circle behind the Big House.

blog_matt

ICECAPS PI Matt Shupe from UC Boulder and CIRRES on the MSF and in front of a halo.

blog_meandbighouse

Me in front of the Big House at 10:30 PM this evening.

Summit at Last!

Saturday, May 15th, 2010

We finally arrived at Summit Station around 5:00 PM yesterday (5/14).  Weather concerns at both the Kanger and Summit airstrips kept us grounded for two extra days.  Conditions must be optimal to land and take off again on Summit’s snow runway and bringing cargo planes into the station is a complicated affair.
Our arrival brought the local population to 31.  There can be as many as 60 people on site at any one time during the summer, but in winter, the station is usually occupied by 6 people.  The first hour or so was busy, but cautious.  Safety at a high altitude, remote field station is the first priority.  The paramedic took down our vitals and urged us to take it easy, drink lots of water, and watch each other for signs of altitude sickness.
We ate dinner and settled in to our sleeping quarters.  Most people on the station in summer (including me) stay in tents called Arctic Ovens.  Arctic Ovens act like greenhouses during the day, rising to temperatures exceeding 60 F.  Even though the sun does not set at this time of year and at this latitude, it is low on the horizon during the “night” and temperatures drop considerably.  The nighttime low was -22 F last night and without the more direct influence of the mid-day sun, the tents lose there heat rapidly.  A good sleeping bag is one of the most important thing you have on site!
Today we spent our time organizing our science gear.  We are also working with the construction crew who is building our new facility to make the particular modifications so that it can house the instruments (holes in the roof for instrument ports, workbenches, added structural support, etc.).  Early next week we will begin moving the larger instruments in.  Then we will concentrate on the more detailed work, such as networking the computers to a central workstation.
We have other responsibilities at Summit besides science.  The station is an isolated community and must work together to keep in running order.  Everyone pulls there weight with the responsibilities in the common quarters (dish washing, cleaning, shoveling, etc.).  Though everyone pitches in whenever they can, each day a particular person is assigned “house mouse” duties.  It’s a day off from their non-essential normal duties, where they lead in the house chores.  It is my turn on Monday.
Before I end today, I thought I’d give you an idea of the general layout of the station.  There are a number of buildings on the site including “The Green House” (long term and winter crew quarters), “tent city” (the Arctic Ovens), a workshop, “The Big House” (kitchen, dining, and common room), a workout room, and a couple small science facilities.  These buildings sit in about a thousand foot radius just southeast of a three mile snow airstrip which is used by the C-130s and sometimes Twin Otters to ferry crew and cargo between Kanger and Summit.

If you would like to learn more about the station or check current conditions you can visit: www.summitcamp.org

blog_bighouse

The Big House

blog_arcticoven

An Arctic Oven with a sense of humor.

Kangerlussuaq

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

The journey to Summit Station takes several days and follows the same route as Von’s trip last summer.  Starting in Spokane we traveled to Albany, New York.  From there, the New York Air National Guard 109th Airlift Wing (ANG) flew us to Greenland on a C-130.  The plane stopped halfway in Goose Bay, Labrador to refuel and then continued on to Kangerlussuaq, Greenland (67 N 51 W).  “Kanger” is a small town (~600 people, mostly Inuit and some Danish) and a commercial airport near the west coast of the island just north of the Arctic Circle.  Kanger is where I am now.  We stay here for a day awaiting the final leg of the trip to Summit.  At the moment, we are experiencing some considerable wind which has blown up a lot of dust.  I was planning to hike to a nearby lake, but I’ll have to wait inside for a while.  I’ve decided that this is a good opportunity to fill you all in on the Idaho to Summit journey.

While in Kanger we are staying with Kangerlussuaq International Science Support (KISS).  Until the wind picked up an hour ago, we have had pretty nice weather.  It’s been mostly overcast, but the temperatures have been around 50 F.  Last night after dinner we took a walk along the river that empties into the Kangerlussuaq Fjord at the edge of town.  The river is pretty low right now, but will pick up considerably as the summer progresses.

Earlier today I traveled to Kellyville about 20 km away (to the end of what was, and still may be, the longest road in Greenland).  A large radar run by the Stanford Research Institute International (SRI) is there.  Some ICECAPS collaborators are testing a LIDAR (LIght Detection And Ranging) at the site which will come up to Summit next week.

Tomorrow morning, weather permitting, we fly (again with the ANG) to Summit 250 km or so to the north east.

bloggoosebay

Back on the plane in Goose Bay.

bogkiss1

The KISS building (red) in Kanger.

blogunloadinginkanger1
bogthefjord

Kangerlussuaq Fjord

blogrocket

These are scattered about Kanger. They are empty rockets that were attached to C-130s for snow take-offs in case the snow is sticky. Presumably they are now used for spent cigarettes, or maybe just for decoration.

blogkangerfromroad

Looking into Kanger from the north side of the runway.

Studying the Atmosphere in the Frozen North

Monday, May 10th, 2010

Hello Readers,

My name is Chris.  I am a PhD student in the Environmental Science program here at UI.  Over the next several years I will be working with a team of atmospheric scientists from the Universities of Idaho, Colorado (Boulder), and Wisconsin (Madison) studying atmospheric properties over the Greenland Ice Sheet.  The project is called ICECAPS (“An Integrated Characterization of Energy, Clouds, Atmospheric state, and Precipitation at Summit”).  The goal is simple, but the task is far from it.  We are seeking to build a series of high temporal resolution data sets of atmospheric measurements using ground-based remote sensing instruments.  In situ measurements of the atmospheric column will be provided by radiosondes (weather balloons) that will be launched twice every day.  These data will be used by the project and by the greater scientific community to study the thermodynamic state of the atmosphere, as well as the radiative and physical properties of clouds and precipitation.  The site at which this will all happen is called Summit Station (72 N, 38 W).  Summit is a small research station located near the geographical center of Greenland at an elevation of 3200 m (10,500’), marking the top of the ice cap.
As some of you may remember (see previous posts) Dr. Von Walden of UI Geography (the project’s Principle Investigator) made a site visit in July and August of last year.  The station is small and our project is large, requiring a whole new building to be constructed to house our instruments.  Dr. Walden made the trip to help direct the preparation and logistics for the project.  Greenland is now emerging from the long winter and it is time to get busy and get the ICECAPS data rolling!  This is where my role begins.  As an early career scientist I am very excited to have the opportunity to do some field work.  I will be at Summit for several weeks from the middle of May through early June 2010 to assist with the deployment.  There is much to do, including integrating the various instruments into the building, getting them running order, setting up the network which will monitor and archive the data, setting up for our radiosonde launches, training our station “techs” on unfamiliar instruments, and, of course, doing our duties as members of the station as a whole.  In late winter of next year I will return to serve as the ICECAPS station tech for several months.
In addition to my colleagues from our collaborating institutions, I am joined by another UI team member, Brad Halter.  Brad will stay on through August as ICECAPS first station tech.

- Christopher J Cox

Flume U

Monday, December 21st, 2009
The flume models the real environment of a riverbed.

The flume models the real environment of a riverbed.

My second stop during my visit to the University of Idaho’s main structure in Boise took me to what I would consider the facility’s pride and joy - the water flume.

The flume looks like a cross between a giant, mechanized bed of a dump truck and a slip-and-slide. The main feature is a ramp with walls extending nearly 70-feet long and measuring 6 -feet wide. One end of the flume can be lowered or raised up to the ceiling to give the flume a different degree of elevation; up to 11 degrees.

The purpose of the flume is to study how waters run in river beds. Scientists fill the device with pebbles and rocks measuring up to 2.5 inches in diameter, raise the flume’s degree of incline to match the conditions of the river bed and run a whole bunch of water over the simulated riverbed.

As this is happening, a motorized sensor sits on railings over the stream of water. It shoots up and down the entire length of the flume, all the while taking detailed measurements with lasers of up to six separate parameters. The result is a detailed look at how the water is flowing over the rocks, how the sediment is traveling with the water and the overall complex system of a riverbed.

The flume is one of the largest, most versatile, most impressive of its kind in the entire world.

So what can a scientist do with such a flume? Besides studying what the affects of a flooding of the Boise River would be and designing a whitewater recreation park for the city, Elowyn Yager, assistant professor at the Center for Ecohydraulic Research (CER), which is the name of the center that runs the flume, studies fluvial geomorphology. Just in case you’re not sure, that is the science of rivers in the landscape. She studies how rivers transport sediment in order to predict how environmental changes such as fires, logging and landslides will affect mountain ecosystems.

However, there are a ton of people who want to use the flume. It never sits idle. The center has a research team from Great Britain coming over the summer. Additionally, students from Nepal, Costa Rica, Chile, Italy, Australia, Germany, Bangladesh and Austria have all utilized the facility.

And to take it a step further, the director of CER, Peter Goodwyn, wants to link the computers to a world wide computing system, so researchers from around the world can receive data and run experiments with the flume from anywhere in the world.

As you can tell, I was very impressed with the flume, and in the near future, I think the whole state - even the whole country - will be as well.

Q&A with President Nellis

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

Several weeks ago I wrote about a trip to the University of Idaho’s joint research facility with the Navy at Bayview. My tour was more of a tag-along of a tour being given to President Nellis. While he was in northern Idaho, President Nellis was kind enough to drop by the Coeur d’Alene Brewing Company to give the month’s lecture for the Science on Tap Coeur d’Alene series.

He began the talk by talking about his past experiences in research using geographic information systems, or GIS. Unfortunately, the lapel microphone I had pinned to him ran out of batteries before he even began speaking, so that part of the presentation was lost. However, he basically said the same thing as the Q&A I conducted with him a little while ago.

Luckily, halfway through the talk I noticed the microphone wasn’t working and I switched to external audio input. The audio isn’t great, but it’s there. So enjoy the following two videos of President Nellis taking questions from the audience at February’s lecture.

Here is a brief rundown of what he spoke about in the first half:

  • Did his GIS work support Global Climate Change claims?
  • GIS and future applications
  • Technology transfer and what is happening at the University of Idaho
  • The Center for Microelectronics and Biomolecular Research and more business-like extensions and spin-offs

In the second half of his question session, President Nellis addresses:

  • How tech transfer can benefit the University of Idaho
  • How do you keep a football coach?
  • The role of a new product marketing position for the university
  • How athletics can help academics
  • The importance of signature events such as the Lionel Hampton Jazz Festival 5:50
  • A story of GPS failure in the African jungle

And he wraps it all up by joining in the singing of the Vandal fight song.

Meet President Duane Nellis, the Scientist

Friday, October 16th, 2009

President Nellis gives a speech with his wife, Ruthie, looking on.

President Nellis gives a speech with his wife, Ruthie, looking on.

President Duane Nellis has a long history of scientific research in the field of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and remote sensing. Read as he talks about his experiences in the field from his undergraduate days at Montana State University to his days as Vice President for Research at Kansas State University and his views of the importance of research activities at a university in general.

How did you become interested in studying GIS and earth sciences?

I began in engineering, but eventually looked for something that allowed me more flexibility in my curriculum because I’ve always had broad interests. I looked at earth sciences because I’ve always been interested in discovering new areas while traveling with my parents. Plus, my wife, Ruthie, was in earth sciences when I was looking for a major and her classes seemed like a good fit for my interests.

It seems to have worked out well. Did you get to do any research as an undergraduate?

Quite a bit, actually. Especially at the junior and senior level. I had a capstone experience summer project, for example, where I looked at rural land use patterns and characteristics in northwest Montana. That was the start of some of my interest in land analysis and natural resource use.

So apparently you enjoyed the experience though because you kept with it, going on to graduate school.

The university educational experience was like a light bulb going on in my head. It was just so refreshing to be in an environment that allowed me to really do the things for which I really had a passion. My master’s research looked at the effectiveness of Oregon legislation that was meant to protect prime agricultural lands from urban development east of Corvallis. I used aerial photographs taken over a 10-year period and examined the changes that had occurred in land use.

I see that you finished your degree in just over a calendar year before leaping into your Ph.D. work. That must have been a lot of work.

It was certainly a fairly intense period. One thing that was really evolving nationally in geography was remote sensing. My dissertation focused on application of remote sensing in irrigation for agriculture. I was intrigued by the impact that center pivots were having on water use, irrigation and crop production. I looked at whether there were inefficiencies or irregularities in irrigation water delivery and different types of irrigation systems.

How could you tell that from aerial data?

I used thermal infrared imagery to detect where water delivery canals were leaking, for example. Soils have a different temperature where there are leakage sites. You can also delineate them with thermal imaging.

Back then, there was no GPS except for military purposes, so one of the challenges was what was called “ground truthing” or ground inspections. That’s where I correlated ground data with satellite data or aircraft data.

It sounds like you were working with some pretty rudimentary equipment by today’s standards.

Early satellite data had more coarse resolution - we thought we were in 7th heaven when we got 30-meter resolution. More recently, when I was Provost at Kansas State, I had an image of Manhattan, Kansas, from commercial satellites that had four-meter resolution.

And I remember first setting up our computers to process satellite data. The discs were 8-inch floppies; to do a statistical analysis I would start the computer, go home for dinner and come back a couple of hours later. It took that long to run the data. Today, such processing can be done on a laptop.

What sorts of research did you get into after you completed your dissertation?

At Kansas State, I did quite a bit of research out in western Kansas in the high plains region and – again using satellite data – tried to develop a model for estimating water use. The idea was to apply my model to areas that did not have water meters so that they could get some estimate of water use in the Ogallala Aquifer region where ground water depletion was an issue.

I also worked with bison at a long-term ecological research site at the Konza Prairie, part of which was fenced and supported herds of bison. We were interested in their grazing patterns and what impacts they were having on the grassland ecosystem in the tall grass prairie reserve.

Sounds pretty fascinating.

President Duane Nellis.

President Duane Nellis.

Actually, it more fascinating. I also had the opportunity to look at the rural land-use system in Botswana in southern Africa. Historically, one of the issues in Botswana is overgrazing and desertification. I worked on a collaborative team to develop a series of vegetation indices to estimate grazing pressure on the edge of the Kalahari Desert where they graze cattle.

While we were there, we learned that the northern part of Botswana was having issues too, with a high density of elephants. We examined elephant pressure on the landscape from satellite data. Because elephants tend to debark trees and even push them over, it’s quite impressive to see their impact on the landscape.

Did you come out of Africa with any interesting stories?

When I was in Botswana, there were all different varieties of Acacia, many of which have these huge thorns – almost like fishhooks – that if you got them stuck in your skin, it was very painful. I had one such thorn go through my heavy boot into my foot.

And in Africa was the first time I had a chance to use a GPS system in the field and it was really neat. Once we were in the field, we were out on the fringes of the Kalahari Desert and had been doing field work throughout the day, when all of a sudden the battery pack on the GPS went dead. We were using it to keep us on track because the field maps we had were not very accurate.

We had a reserve battery pack, so we plugged that in, but of course it didn’t work. So we were out on these sand tracks and none of us spoke the native language. We were going into these villages trying to find our way back to our base village and looking at sun angle for the time of the day and direction.

Luckily, we knew the general direction of the main road, so we were able to make it out. But we learned early on not to become too reliant on technology out in the field.

I’ll bet your students loved to hear stories like that in class.

Absolutely. I found that when I was able to bring in my own research into the classroom to use as an example, it had a huge impact on student learning. I think sharing data with students in a laboratory setting and having them come up with their own conclusions helps enrich the student experience.

I think that’s what’s exciting about being at a research university like the University of Idaho. Sometimes people think some professors are just doing research and that they don’t really care about teaching. But what I have found is that some of the most outstanding teachers are also the most outstanding researchers.

Speaking of the University of Idaho, do you see a lot of your areas of expertise in use on campus?

The things I’ve had experience in are directly applicable in forest analysis, like with the pine beetle infestations as well as in agriculture and water, which is such a crucial resource in this state. Remote sensing and GIS has tremendous applicability. For example, if we can gain understanding about water efficiencies more fully through this kind of technology, then we can maximize the economic gain through agricultural production. Maybe through the use of these types of technologies we can gain more efficiency in the system and better manage it for long-term sustainability.

Any chance you might jump in and get involved, lending us some of your expertise?

Well, ever since I became a provost at Kansas State, though I continued to keep up with some general reading, it has been hard to keep up with the accelerated changes in remote sensing and GIS. It’s just evolving so rapidly. But I still have a passion for my area of expertise in remote sensing and I am still intrigued by the technology and software.

And even though I wasn’t the lead on the project, I coauthored a remote sensing book that was recently published. I was very much involved in writing it, especially the chapter I authored on remote sensing of crop land agriculture. That allowed me to catch up on where the literature is on remote sensing.

But keeping up with GIS and remote sensing technology has become almost a hobby because now there’s just no time. I don’t want to divert time from being President. I mean that’s my number one, two, three, four, five and sixth priority!

Watching the Clouds… in Greenland

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009
One of the research buildings at Summit Station, Greenland.

One of the research buildings at Summit Station, Greenland.

Several weeks ago, Professor Von Walden made several contributions to VandalScience while traveling to Summit, Greenland. His posts spoke of -26 degree Celsius temperatures, cramming into a C-130, research buildings on skis and details on his visit to the future research site.

Today, the Spokesman-Review printed a story written by Becky Kramer about his research plans. The piece does an excellent job outlining the scope of his five-year project and the reasons for conducting the research. Here are a few choice excerpts.

“Associate geography professor Von Walden and colleagues at two other universities want to know if Greenland’s cloud cover is getting thicker. The answer could have important ramifications for rising sea levels.

‘We know that clouds are important in polar zones. They trap heat,’ Walden said. ‘If the cloud properties are changing over time, as a result of climate change, that could dramatically affect the amount of energy that returns back to the ice sheet from the atmosphere.’

The initial work will establish baseline cloud conditions, Walden said. After four years, the researchers hope to continue the work through additional grants.”

Sunset over the Greenland ice sheet.

Sunset over the Greenland ice sheet.

So, in short, Von Walden and his associates are going to observe many properties of the clouds, atmosphere and climate at the highest point in Greenland. Several instruments will be operating year-round to take measurements of temperature, precipitation, cloud thickness, energy transfer rates and even the motion of individual particles in the cloud down to the millimeter.

By itself, this data won’t solve the climate change mystery. However, when the data is added to climate change models in conjunction with many other observational projects, the result will be a much clearer and more accurate view of future weather.

There are many who debate whether or not the Earth is really warming. Still others argue that while the climate is changing, humans have little or nothing to do with the phenomenon. However, I don’t think anyone will argue that doing the research to find the answers is a bad idea. Projects such as these are crucial for gaining a better understanding of our environment and all of our futures.

Global Cooling?

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009
Someone with a spare glove and a sense of humor lives in Moscow, Idaho.

Someone with a spare glove and a sense of humor lives in Moscow, Idaho.

Here’s a report from Europe that really surprised me.

Mojib Latif of the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences at Kiel University, Germany - one of the lead authors of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recently announced he believes the world is going into a couple decades of global cooling.

If you’re unfamiliar with the IPCC, it is the international body of scientists who put out a report on global climate change every five years. And each of their past few reports have unequivocally stated that the Earth is rapidly heating, we are the cause of the change and that the world is on a disaster course that could culminate in global devastation by 2100.

But something has been happening to the weather over the past few years that none of them saw coming.

“The strong warming effect that we experienced during the last decades will be interrupted. Temperatures will be more or less steady for some years, and thereafter will pickup again and continue to warm.”

That was part of the message Latif delivered to more than 1500 of the world’s top climate scientists in Geneva during a recent conference. And he’s not alone. More and more climate change scientists are beginning to report a recent cooling trend and predicting that it will last a decade or more.

But you don’t hear a peep from the national media about this. Some people would argue that it is because they don’t want to look like fools, having preached global annihilation for the past 10 years. Others would argue that because the new data doesn’t stir sensationalist headlines, it just doesn’t make for good news. Whatever the reasons, I’m actually glad that this is being ignored.

If these headlines got out in the same large and loud ways the national media has previously shouted research on global climate change, the general public would get the wrong message. They’d see this as evidence that scientists are wrong, that science is a sham and that nobody really knows anything. All faith would be lost in the scientific community - at least where global climate change is concerned.

What the general public - and the national media - often fail to understand is that science is a process and is always based on the assumption that what you think is wrong. A researcher makes a best guess or assumption about the way the world works, and then goes to try to disprove the theory. If the theory holds up again and again, then it becomes accepted as truth.

At least until someone disproves it.

This report on global cooling is no different. The best and brightest minds the world has to offer are trying to create their best guess as to what the future holds for the world’s climate. Along the way, they constantly test their theories, make changes, update models and put new information into the calculations. Add to the equation the fact that the weather is hugely unpredictable and the result is simply a best guess, especially when it comes to the short term, and you’re bound to get some irregularities.

We all know the weather trends in the places we live. I know - based on prior experiences - that it is going to get really cold this winter and then warm up again when spring comes. But I have no clue what the weather is going to be like tomorrow. Or even next week. Logic tells me that because it is most likely going to become winter in a few months, that next week will be colder than this week.

But it doesn’t have to be.

In much the same way, predictions that the Earth will be much warmer in 200 years does not mean that the world has to be warmer next year. There are just too many variables involved on a short-term basis.

Nonetheless, some people will cite this cooling trend as evidence that global warming is a sham and that scientists are wrong.

Maybe they are.

But we’re talking about hundreds of people who are much, much smarter than I am, who have devoted their lives to the study of climate change. If their best guess is that our pollution is causing the world to warm up at dangerous levels, then I’m going to listen.

And if by some chance they’re wrong, what’s the harm in cleaning up our act and putting less pollution in the world?